Compare

macOS clipboard managers, compared

Tameo, Clipy, Paste, and Raycast side by side — across price, Apple-Silicon support, local-only storage, open source, and Japanese support. Tameo positions itself as “Clipy’s simplicity, rebuilt for modern macOS.”

AspectTameoClipyPasteRaycast
PriceFreeFreePaid (subscription)Free + paid (Pro)
Open source
Apple-Silicon-native
No external services (Firebase, etc.)Bundles FirebaseiCloud syncCloud (Pro)
Clipboard history
History searchIn progress
SnippetsPartial
OCR search inside images
Encrypted history at restUndisclosedUndisclosed
Transform on paste (half-width, URL clean)Partial
Japanese input & search / JIS layoutPartialPartial
UI languageEnglishJapaneseMultipleEnglish
Signed & notarized

● = yes / — = no. Clipy resumed development in 1.3.0 (2026-06-20) with native Apple Silicon support and a rebuilt database. Details vary by each app’s version (overview as of July 2026).

Which one should you pick?

You use Clipy and want search or OCR

Tameo is worth a look. It keeps Clipy’s feel — the ⌘⇧V palette, number-key paste, and snippet import — while adding full-text history search and OCR search inside images (neither is in Clipy 1.3.0 yet).

See the migration steps →

You never want your history to leave the device

Tameo fits. Beyond having no servers, accounts, or analytics, it bundles no third-party SDKs (no Firebase), and being open source (MIT) you can verify in code that nothing is sent. Clipy 1.3.0 bundles Firebase, and Paste / Raycast(Pro) assume cloud sync — better choices if you want cross-device sync.

You want a launcher or a polished paid tool

Raycast or Paste fit — extra features beyond the clipboard, cross-device sync, and refined UI. The trade-offs are that they’re paid, cloud-oriented, and closed source.